Tuesday, October 17, 2017

Larry Flint and the Ritual Defamation Vortex

What can unite Social Justice Marxist Puritans and a Flesh Peddling Pimp and Pig? Answer, the Ritual Defamation Vortex. (This is the company Frank Schaeffer keeps.)


Have you noticed how unimaginative the Mind War's Thought Manufacturers and Mind Manipulators are? Their weapons have been so thoroughly exposed they have lost their power, like their weapon of Ritual Defamation, which has until Trump worked so very well against anyone who dared to say anything true. It was powerless against the liars, since it is the tool of THE LIAR. And in typical Marxist "opposite meaning" psyop, the worse offender was the Anti-Defamation League and sister groups, the ACLU, and the Southern Poverty Law Center, along with C.A.I.R., the N.A.A.C.P. and other lesser groups that CONSTANTLY practiced Ritual Defamation, labeling people, Racists, Islamophobic, Guilty of Hate Speech, Homophobic, Anti-Semitic, etc., etc., etc.

Consider the example of Senator Bob Menendez, on trial on felony charges for massive corruption and yet, he rests in the protective bubble of the LIAR

and he is protected in the "media" not mentioned and if mentioned, mentioned in the mildest ways. AS are the Felons, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, James Comey, Susan Rice, (the complete list would be hundreds long) immune to prosecution and immune to Ritual Defamation in the Media.

The Space Time continuum seemed to break last week when we all saw the sudden and surprising Ritual Defamation of Harvey Weinstein.  By the way, a PROPER USE of Ritual Defamation, yet such an isolated example. I was left asking, "Why NOW?"

The Cultural Marxist anti-christs, sacrificed a BELOVED WHALE, though old, dissipated and past his usefulness, to create a "Ritual Defamation Vortex" for MORE Ritual Defamations, hoping against hope that they could suck President Donald Trump into the Weinstein Vortex, sacrificing one to sink another. FAT CHANCE.

Now look at the Rabid Dog they propped up, wiped up his drool, changed his diaper, and trotted out to try the SAME ploy they did last year, this time with ten times the money. Are you beginning to understand what I mean by UNIMAGINATIVE. After all, how unimaginative has been the multi-angles of the NON-EXISTENT Russia Story? Yet every day with BORING DEMONIC stubbornness, it drones on and on and on and on. Totally UNIMAGINATIVE.

Look at the ridiculous "Trump Dossier" about as unimaginative bit of fiction writing possible. All of the coverup have been equally as unimaginative leaving one to say, "They can't really be this stupid can they?"  Yes they can, their minds are fat and lazy they have won so easily for so long, faced with real opposition they are melting.

BTW, speaking of those immune to Ritual Defamation, we have seen in the Clinton era, even so-called "feminists" rise to the defense of this flesh-peddling pimp, Larry Flint. That is about as immune as immune gets.


Larry Flynt offers $1M for scandalous video of Trump

Judy Kurtz
October 17th 2016

The audio or video recordings must be verified and show the GOP presidential nominee “engaging in illegal activity or acting in a sexually demeaning or derogatory manner,” a news release accompanying
the Monday announcement
stated. Submissions also must be handed over before Election Day.
Flynt’s announcement comes the same month The Washington Post published a 2005 recording in which Trump discusses making advances on a married woman and how he can kiss and grope women without consent because of his celebrity status.
“I have always celebrated women,” Flynt, 73, said in a statement. “Women in all shapes and sizes. To treat a woman like Mr. Trump himself has is both disappointing and unbelievable, especially coming from someone who wants to be our President.”
It’s not the first time Flynt has targeted Trump. Earlier this year, the free speech advocate said he was sending a copy of “The Donald,” a pornographic spoof of the real estate mogul, to every Republican member of Congress.
“Mr. Flynt continues to be appalled by the hypocrisy of our elected officials who dictate how the American people should live their lives behind closed doors while themselves engaging in the variety of activities they publicly condemn,” Monday’s statement from the pornography giant read. “Mr. Trump claims that ‘nobody has more respect for women than me’ despite tremendous amounts of evidence to the contrary. Mr. Flynt has made it his mission to call these hypocrites out and provide the public with as much information about their indiscretions as possible.”
Flynt made a proposal similar to the Trump tape offer in 1998 during President Bill ClintonBill ClintonAll five living former presidents to attend hurricane relief concert The Hill's 12:30 Report The Hill's 12:30 Report MORE’s impeachment trial and again in 2007, when he said he would pay a million dollars for “documented evidence of illicit sexual liaisons with a prominent member of public office.”

Saturday, October 14, 2017

The New Iran Policy vis a vis the Nuclear Deal Presented on a SEA of NeoCon LIES.



"Trump's Very Sane Iran Policy was announced within a SEA of NeoCon Lies. I'm for the policy, I HATE the lies." When I made this statement some people I thought were AWAKE asked, "What lies? I don't understand you saying this." EDUCATION TIME.

Don't get me wrong, I am FOR the change in policy, but I cannot let stand the torrent of NeoCon lies Trump uncomfortably read. He read like a Hostage or Prisoner of War, in a hostile nation. 

(1) This isn't a lie Trump has told but is the constant lie of the CIA/Globalist/Zionist Establishment for nearly fifteen years, that is that Iran is a year or two years at the most from having nuclear bomb technology and a bomb. How many years has that been a lie? Every year so far and it MAY BE even now, a lie.  Should I believe the CIA assessment? (The boy who cried wolf.)

(2) Iran is Indeed under the control of a "fanatical regime" that seized power in 1979, but it is a HALF LIE, in that Jimmy Carter's CIA CREATED the revolution and empowered that Ayatollah Khomeini, who was in exile in Paris, demanding of that the "Shah of Iran" (another puppet leader installed as head of Iran by the CIA in a coup in 1953 when they overthrew the ELECTED LEADER Mohammad Mosaddegh)   . . .  the CIA returned the Ayatollah from exile against the Shah's wishes.  The CIA/Shadow Government thought they could make of the Ayatollah and the "revolutionary guard" (they created) another set of CIA Puppets, they miscalculated. They did not understand the Islamicists Mind. The Iranian Islamists decided not to be the CIA's puppet.

(3) Iran is NOT a threat to the U.S. To claim they are is a lie. We have them surrounded with 17 major U.S. military bases. We are capable of wiping Iran off the face of the earth in a matter of hours. This is not about U.S. security, but Israeli and as important, Saudi Arabisn Security. We don't get much in our press about the natural anamosity between Iran and Saudi Arabia, but it is as real and ingrained as the anamosity toward Israel. I don't mind protecting Israel, I couldn't give a flying shite about protecting Saudi Arabia, the core of TRUE Islamic Fanaticism, but, just TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT IT.

(4) FACT - the present problem in IRAN is the result of CIA/Mossad/British Actions over the last 50 years. (We could go further back to the 19teens when the Brits lured the Persians into a country raping Oil Deal and following WWII refused to renegotiate the deal.  Instead, MI-6 and the CIA, overthrew the legally elected-democratically elected government and replace it with a puppet who would cooperate with the U.S. and BP - British Petroleum to rape his own country.)

(5) When Trump paints a picture of the Radical Regime in Iran, raiding the wealth of a great nation and civilization, we could use the exact same language of the Rape of America by the Globalists/Trotskyite (Marxists and  NeoCons) the SAME PEOPLE who are even now, trying to foment War with Iran and Russia, RAPING American Wealth to do it. Especially when he spoke of "spreading death, destruction and chaos around the world. Really his words would perfectly fit the Globalist's Rape of America and the grand march of Regime Change and Nation Building that has left failed state after failed state and GENOCIDE.

(6) There is nothing Trump can say about the suppression of Persian Culture in Iran, that is not true of the DeepState/Shadow Government's suppression of Christian Culture here in the U.S. - as was personified in the Obama Years.

(7) Lie - Agents of the Iranian Regime did not hold American hostages. The REVOLUTIONARY GUARD, created by the CIA, did. Immediately the "Mullas in Iran" challenged the power of the Revolutionary Guard, and after about eighteen months formed what could be considered a "government." During that time there really wasn't a "government of Iran" it was not yet formed.

(8) True, Hezbollah is an Iranian financed army. They took control of Christian Lebanon, fomented civil war there to do it, and it is a MAJOR foreign policy failure that the U.S. did not stop it. But we did not, Why? Because both the U.S. and Israel believed a FAILED STATE of Lebanon would be easier to "manage." BTW, the GREAT Ronald Reagan turned tail and RAN following the Hezbollah bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut. We abandoned Christian Lebanon, a shameful moment in U.S. History. That incident made the radical elements in the Islamic world believe America was a "paper tiger" and would always retreat. So far they are right, we have not confronted Radical Islam, we have only battled some ambiguous thing called "terrorism."

(9) Lie - The idea that the bombing in Saudi Arabia and Africa were Iranian caused, using Al Qaeda is laughable. Al Qaeda is a CIA/Muslim Brotherhood creation and proxy army. Iran has no control over it.

(10) Lie or just clever psyops? The idea that Iran was evil for providing safe harbor for Osama Bin Laden's son, is ludicrous when Bush protected the entire Bin Laden Clan - the ONLY air traffic in the U.S. in the five days following 911 was the U.S. Defense Establishment escorting the Saudi Royal Family and the Bin Ladens to safety in Saudi Arabia. And if memory serves one of Osama's daughters lives in New York and has for decades.

(11) Iran the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism - really have we forgotten the CIA creation and support of Al Qaeda, ISIS, Al Nusra? This is a HELLISH lie and flies in the face of history. Yes, Iran has a proxy army called Hezbollah, and probably other groups it sponsors, but their sponsorship of Jihadism PALES in comparison to the SAUDI's Civilization Jihad, via the export of Wahabism, and the U.S. use of Jihadis in proxy wars all across the globe from the Philippines to Central Africa. Again, on the same subject, the Idea that Iran supports Al Qaeda and Hamas is ludicrous. These are SUNNI Jihadi groups, The Iranian are Shia. would they support them if they were serving Iranian purposes? YES.  Have we supported them when they were serving Globalist purposes? YES.

(12) The only place Iran has threatened navigation is in the Straits of Hormuz. China threatens navigation in the entire South China Sea. Iran's threat is all low tech, and have been absent since the Nuke deal.  The Sunni Pirate of Somalia has been a much greater challenge to international shipping than Iran. Again another problem the CIA created by the destruction of Somalia.

(13) "It (Iran) imprisons Americans on false charges." Fact, most of the American imprisoned by Iran have been CIA agents and operatives, just like the situation in N. Korea. By the way, have you ever read the list of Americans imprisoned by the U.S. Government or "eliminated" on false charges.  According to the NDAA, one does not have to be CHARGED in America to be eliminated, merely named an Enemy of the State, the exact power Joseph Stalin held in the Soviet Union. And it does not require even a "presidential order" the NDAA read, "or any of several high ranking Federal Officials."

(14) The cyber attacks on the U.S. via Iran, pale in comparison to the reverse. This is an on-going war for nearly 20 years. Who struck first? Is Iran the only offender? Should we attack and bomb every nation that attacks our cyber complex? Hillary Clinton thought so and wanted to use it as an excuse to bomb Russia.

(15) So the Iranian Regime shot unarmed protesters during the (COLOR REVOLUTION) green revolution, (CIA CREATED).  The U.S. shot unarmed protesters in Berkley and Kent State. Does that give another nation the right to militarily attack us?

(16) LIE - Yes, Iran has used our STUPID invasion of Iraq and the vacuum created there to further the Shia power structure there. Maybe Iran started the civil war in Yemen - though I think the Saudis did. It DID NOT start the civil war in Syria, the CIA DID and this is documented FACT.

(17) Both the U.N. and the Christians in Syria say that the "chemical attacks" blamed on Assad in Syria were the work of ISIS/CIA. Iran is an ally of the Government of Syria, just as Russia is. There is no evil in that.

(18) If the Iranian secret service had overthrown the American Government, and installed two successive Puppet Regimes, the first brutal but successful for two decades, and the second able to turn against Iran and fight back, wouldn't we be chanting "Death to Iran."

Those are the misleading statements and outright lies of the first six minutes of President Trump's speech introducing his change of policy vis a vis the Iran Nuclear Deal.  Again, I am for the policy change because I don't want to see a nuclear Iran, though I am as concerned for the present Nuclear Pakistan. We don't have to get to this sane policy through a FOG of NeoCon LIES.  TRUTH would go a long way here to served the survival of Humanity.

Thursday, October 12, 2017

The Propaganda Grows More FAKE NEWS and Desperate: No Wonder Trump is Talking About Taking Them Down.

Legally he could take them down as the threat to national security they are. When an entire industry is controlled by the Deep State Psyops Apparatus and LIES for a living, it is time to treat them as the threat they are.

BTW, I hate to sound like a broken record, but I told you four years ago that by 2016 they would not even be trying to cover up the fact they were lying. The difference is the whole scheme seems to be backfiring on them.  However, until they are taken down, they are not defeated. They have unlimited money behind them and they will not go away by loss of ratings.

Here is Alex Jones exposing a couple of blatant examples of just IN YOUR FACE lying psyop.  We cannot allow those in league with the LIAR to WIN!



Trump just gave U.N.E.S.C.O. a KILL SHOT.

Trump just took down a huge tool of the Globalist Shadow Government, and FURTHER weakened the Globalist Rogues in the CIA. 

SHOCKED and pleasantly so! Trump just took the U.S. out of U.N.E.S.C.O. - The U.S. State Department spokesperson said the reason was the need for UNESCO reforms and the body's anti-Israel Bias. I don't think so. After all, Israel is still a member and this is Trump surprising us and Trump knows the Malthusian/Genocidal Cultural Marxist structure and goals of UNESCO and its close ties as a TOOL of the CIA Deep State, creating hard and soft genocide around the world. 

I did an in-depth study several years ago and wrote 19 articles about it, based on a criticism of lectures by a Yale Professor who is the foremost expert on "Evolutionary Demographics" a euphemism for Globalist Population Reduction Genocide. The coordinator of this Globalist Marxist Genocidal Operation is CIA/UNESCO. AND PRAISE BE TO THE LIFE-GIVING CREATOR GOD, America because of Donald Trump just stopped supporting it. 

Spin in your graves, Julian and Aldous Huxley, Allen and John Foster Dulles, John and David Rockefeller! May your victims torment you. 

UNESCO has been the conduit financing the majority of the 1.6 BILLION Abortions worldwide, (just since 1990) completely running the African Operation, with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, and even subsidized the One Child Policy in China; UNESCO owns and operates most of the abortion operations in India. AND WE JUST KICKED IT TO THE CURB!

The Marxist media will spin this that Trump is so racist that he is intentionally "creating" genocide. That's the inside-outside game. 

Anti-Trump Psyop, Russia and Weinstein


Do not let it escape your notice that the left outed Harvey Weinstein in the week of the anniversary of the Billy Bush tape where Trump talked about women being so enamored with famous men that a famous man could just, "grab their pussies." This is called, "Never let a crisis go to waste." They constantly mention Weinstein, Bill Cosby, and Trump as sexual predators, when the comparison of the particular behavior is ridiculous, but since they could not make the sexual predator lie stick last year, this is a second bite at the apple.



With all the yearlong psyop against Trump about so-called "Russian Influence" in the election, have you ever wondered why they have never mentioned this man (a close friend of Vladimir Putin) and his op-ed and interviews? The simple answer is HE WAS TELLING YOU THE TRUTH, a truth of which they do not want you reminded.

What was that TRUTH?

Here is the short version:

"If they vote for Hillary it's war. It will be a short movie. There will be Hiroshimas and Nagasakis everywhere," said Vladimir Zhirinovsky, an ultra-nationalist ally of Putin known for his fiery rhetoric. http://reut.rs/2dMyJlv


I do not think this fellow is exaggerating. These Globalist Psychopaths, whose puppet Hillary Clinton is, fully intend to create nuclear conflagration between the U.S. and Russia - why not? what could be better for these Luciferians than to get two Christian populations to slaughter one another. It has been Satan's motus operandi since the Protestant Revolution.

Here is the Full version:

Putin ally tells Americans: vote Trump or face nuclear war

Andrew Osborn7 Min Read

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Americans should vote for Donald Trump as president next month or risk being dragged into a nuclear war, according to a Russian ultra-nationalist ally of President Vladimir Putin who likes to compare himself to the U.S. Republican candidate.
Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a flamboyant veteran lawmaker known for his fiery rhetoric, told Reuters in an interview that Trump was the only person able to de-escalate dangerous tensions between Moscow and Washington.
By contrast, Trump’s Democratic rival Hillary Clinton could spark World War Three, said Zhirinovsky, who received a top state award from Putin after his pro-Kremlin Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR) came third in Russia’s parliamentary election last month.
Many Russians regard Zhirinovsky as a clownish figure who makes outspoken statements to grab attention but he is also widely viewed as a faithful servant of Kremlin policy, sometimes used to float radical opinions to test public reaction.
“Relations between Russia and the United States can’t get any worse. The only way they can get worse is if a war starts,” said Zhirinovsky, speaking in his huge office on the 10th floor of Russia’s State Duma, or lower house of parliament.
"Americans voting for a president on Nov. 8 must realize that they are voting for peace on Planet Earth if they vote for Trump. But if they vote for Hillary it's war. It will be a short movie. There will be Hiroshimas and Nagasakis everywhere."
Zhirinovsky’s comments coincide with deep disagreements between Washington and Moscow over Syria and Ukraine and after the White House last week accused Russia of a campaign of cyber attacks against Democratic Party organizations.
Even as WikiLeaks released another trove of internal documents from Clinton’s campaign on Wednesday, Putin insisted his country was not involved in an effort to influence the U.S. presidential election.


Zhirinovsky likes to shock liberal public opinion and he has frequently heaped scorn on the West, which he and other Russian nationalists regard as decadent, hypocritical and corrupted by political correctness.
His combative style, reminiscent of Trump‘s, ensures him plenty of television air time and millions of votes in Russian elections, often from the kind of blue-collar workers who are the bedrock of the U.S. Republican candidate’s support.
Zhirinovsky once proposed blocking off mostly Muslim southern Russia with a barbed wire fence, echoing Trump’s call for a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky, leader of the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, speaks during an interview with Reuters in Moscow, Russia, October 11, 2016. Picture taken October 11, 2016. REUTERS/Maxim Zmeyev
Zhirinovsky, who said he met Trump in New York in 2002, revels in his similarities with the American businessman - they are the same age, favor coarse, sometimes misogynistic language and boast about putting their own country first. Zhirinovsky has even said he wants a DNA test to see if he is related to Trump.
But unlike Trump, a billionaire real estate developer who casts himself as the anti-establishment candidate in the U.S. presidential race with no past political experience, Zhirinovsky is a consummate political insider who has sat in the Duma for more than two decades.
Putin has also praised Trump as “very talented”, while the Republican candidate has said the Kremlin boss is a better leader than U.S. President Barack Obama. Clinton has accused Trump of being too cozy with Putin and questioned his business interests in Russia.
In other comments that have delighted Moscow, Trump has questioned the value of NATO for Washington, has spoken ambiguously about Russia’s 2014 annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea and suggested that the United States under his leadership would adopt a more isolationist foreign policy.
"He (Trump) won't care about Syria, Libya and Iraq and why an earth should America interfere in these countries? And Ukraine. Who needs Ukraine?," said Zhirinovsky, who once counted himself a friend of Iraq's Saddam Hussein and Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi and whose deaths he still laments.
“Trump will have a brilliant chance to make relations more peaceful ... He’s the only one who can do this,” he said, adding that Trump could even win a Nobel peace prize.
In contrast, Zhirinovsky described Clinton as “an evil mother-in law” and said her record as secretary of state under Obama in 2009-2013 showed she was unfit to lead her country.
“She craves power. Her view is that Hillary is the most important person on the planet, that America is an exceptional country, as Barack Obama said,” said Zhirinovsky. “That’s dangerous. She could start a nuclear war.”
In typically chauvinistic remarks, Zhirinovsky said Clinton’s gender should also bar her from the presidency.
“Most Americans should choose Trump because men have been leading for millions of year. You can’t take the risk of having one of the richest, most powerful countries led by a woman president,” he said.
Asked about lewd comments Trump made about women in 2005 that have harmed his campaign, Zhirinovsky defended the Republican: “Men all round the world sometimes say such things that are just for their comrades. We must only consider his business (and political) qualities.”
Though Putin and Trump have never met, Zhirinovsky said he believed they could establish a close working relationship, adding: “Victory for Trump would be a gift to humanity. But if Hillary Clinton wins it will be the last U.S. president ever.”
Editing by Christian Lowe and Gareth Jones

Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Harvey Weinstein and FACEBOOK Censorship

Facebook removed WITHOUT NOTIFYING ME the audio tape of Harvey Weinstein molesting a young actress. SHAME ON FACE BOOK. If it was TRUMP they would be promoting it. This isn't about decency, this is about political censorship!

Remember Harvey Weinstein is the molester Barrack Obama knowingly sent his girl to work for, which tells you everything you need to know about this Luciferian Class of people.

Here's to you SUCKERBURG!



TRUMP'S Travel Ban VICTORY: Not Reported By FAKE NEWS

October 10th 2017: The Supreme Court Unanimously Upheld President Trump's Seven Country Travel Ban, positively affirming Presidential Powers over "UNDESIRABLE ALIENS" as the law clearly states. What this does is make his NEW Ban unassailable via the legal system.

It is a BIG TRUMP WIN, of course the FAKE NEWS is Silent.

Tuesday, October 10, 2017


The NFL PROVED their Marxist CORE Agenda and any of you so-called Conservatives who return to your NFL worship are USEFUL IDIOTS. REAL change cannot happen with you taking a victory lap, just because NOW the NFL wants to save its own financial ass. REAL change happens when you take down the NFL, create a permanent LOSS, regardless of what hypocritical positions they take trying to save their GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZED FAKE INDUSTRY. Real change happens when you COW the Marxists Millionaries and Billionaries, making the fearful to show their Marxist soul, must less press their Marxist Agenda. Instead you say, "busness as usual" while YOU are being raped. 

Return to the NFL and you are no conservative, you are a MARXIST traitor, surrendering in battle YEARS before the WAR is won.

Monday, October 9, 2017

Shuuuooooo! Verboten Subject: The Power of the Jewish Lobby and Jewish NeoCons

I had two extended and interesting exchanges with a Jewish woman, a strong "conservative" by all appearances, who claims to be an "America First" loyalist, yet she defended violently the so-called wisdom of allowing Dual American-Israeli Citizenship.

You see, I am against Dual Citizenship period, no matter what nation is on the other end of that hyphenation "America- *.*

This person, who in every way in years of FB friendship seemed perfectly reasonable and intelligent, suddenly turned "tribal" when I DARED to express my objection to dual citizenship and stated what is absolutely true, that since the Jewish population of the U.S. is about 1.5 percent, it is OBVIOUS from even a cursory observation that Jews are over-represented in every "influential" area of American life, including publishing, all of the media, the FAKE NEWS, the NeoCon Conspirators, the Marxist-Radical-Left, etc., etc. This is not anti-Jewish, merely making the obvious observation of FACT, yet her reaction to me - the reason I call it violent - was to label me an ignorant anti-Semite.

Those of you who know me know how ridiculous this charge is, but at the risk of enduring more opprobrium from the tribal mentality, it is not inappropriate for Americans to be concerned about the disproportionate power of the Jewish/Israeli Lobby. It is real and it is NOT America First, anything but, it was/is the driving force (the NeoCon force) that has created the last years of American Perpetual War.

So what is the reaction when you dare to state some things about the power of AIPAC, the Jewish Lobby will come after you like the Marxist, and using Saul Alinsky methods, you are a racist and a bigot, by simply stating the REALTY of the disproportionate representation and power of the Jewish/Israeli Lobby.  Whenever this happens, you know that the force coming against you is EVIL. Were it not OF THE LIAR, reasonable and rational dialog would be possible. But when histrionics seeks to silence FACT, what Alinsky called "Jamming" the evidence is too clear to be denied.

I spoke with my Jewish friend with measured politeness and reason, explaining that my concern was "generic" and would be the same caution were so many of our government officials and "thought manufacturers" dual citizens American-Russian, American-British, American-German, American-Japanese. This reasonable position was met with:

"The "Zionist" lobby? I have no idea what you think happened in Jerusalem, but you should check the source of your information, because, whether you're aware of it or not, you're regurgitating anti-Semitic talking points from 'The Protocols." (Actually, I was referencing the pages of the New Testament and Jewish Roman Historian, Josephus.) Israel is the only Middle Eastern country where Christians are thriving under the same rights and laws as Israelis. When you attack Israel with the lies and vitriol that you have here, you're attacking the Jews, and I don't have the time, energy, or desire anymore to debate you based on century's old lies, jeolousy, fear, and hatred that you're hell bent on harboring and defending."

So what were the lies and vitriol told against the modern state of Israel? The historical fact that Israel acts in its own self-interest without exception up to and including conducting massive spying operations upon the U.S., for which over the years multiple people have been charged, convicted and imprisoned (some of the worse security breaches in our history) and that they attacked one of our Navy Ships, KNOWING it was a U.S. ship, knocking out its communications and hoping to sink it before anyone could stop it. (Reference "The U.S.S. LIBERTY.")  These are facts NOT lies, NOT jealousy, NOT fear, NOT hatred, NOT vitriol.  What it is, is history the Jewish lobby and those whose primary loyalty is to Israel DO NOT want to be told and rehearsed in public debate. The entire question of the viability of the policy of dual-citizenship, America's reasonable responsibility to and for Israel, and the disproportionate representation of Jews in the public square, the halls of governance etc., is a Verboten Subject.

I use the word VERBOTEN, (the German word) instead of forbidden since it is the specter of the Holocaust that is used as the 911 psyop, to keep the world treating Jews as eternal victims. Tens of millions more died in the Holodomor, another genocide that occurred in the same time frame and most of you have NEVER HEARD OF the Holodomor where mostly Christians died.

Why is this? The logical answer is, let us investigate who writes and publishes the history books to discover the reason for this breach of historical reality.  But the mere suggestion is "Jew Hating", that is anti-Semitic.  BTW, the term anti-Semitic is a term created by the Marxists-Leftist Jewish Hate Group called the "Anti-Defamation League."  As all things Marxist, its name represents the opposite of what it is. Its purpose and function, historically provable and CURRENTLY VISIBLE, (as in last week's attack on Valerie Plame Wilson and the perpetual attack upon Ex-CIA whistleblower Philip Giraldi), is to RITUALLY DEFAME anyone who Dares challenge the Jewish/Israeli Lobby and the Jewish Tribal influence over American foreign policy.

Now, if you take exception to me using the term TRIBAL as relating to Jews, let me share with you my Jewish friend's description of this Tribalism, many of which I have witnessed in the past, To WIT:

"Lisa Michelle Goldstein:
Yes, G-d certainly did disproportionately endow the Jewish people with special qualities that enabled them to survive thousands of years of persecution. It's unprecedented in history. In fact, Jewish survival is a miracle, but we can't help it if it's in our DNA. Just because people don't understand it, doesn't mean there's a conspiracy behind it.

With that said, this post was not directed to you, Butch, but you chose to weigh in here. I do not deny that a majority of those who happen to be born Jewish worship a Leftist ideology, but that IS their religion. It in no way is a reflection of Judaism and actually conflicts with it. History will not look kindly upon them. They have betrayed their own people, but Judaism has nothing to do with the human tendencies towards power and greed. It's not an exclusively Jewish condition.

Either way, Zionism dates as far back as Abraham and the Babylonian Conquest. We pray for our return to Zion every single day, just as most Christians do. It's in our daily prayers.

And to answer your question, no. I am second-generation American born, but that should be irrelevant. All Jews should be Zionists. Religious practicing Jews who pray for the Jewish return to Zion and believe in the Jewish right to self-determination - or even Israeli-Americans with dual citizenship - lean to the right and tend to be loyal to Conservative Constitutional values and principles. It's the majority of Leftist Jews, who have no loyalty or connection to Judaism, Israel, and the Jewish people, who you and I have to worry about."

That is a perfect definition of Tribalism, she stated it clearly, a SUPREMACY of DNA.

What prompted this conversation was the Ritual Defamation of Valerie Plame Wilson for DARING against Tribal Taboo, (Valerie is Jewish) to re-tweet an article by Philip Giraldi, outlining the correlation between the Jewish Lobby and the American NeoCon movement, so many being DUAL American-Israeli Citizens. If we look at the piece of American foreign policy that has been most damaging to the U.S. and to the WORLD, it was conceived by the Masters of a Temporary Think Tank, that produced a plan, a document, a conspiracy, for America in the 21st Century, called, "the Project for the New American Century" (PNAC) which was in reality, the Project for ZIONIST GOALS.  The original document, (scrubbed from the internet) called for "a New Pearl Harbor" incident to galvanize public opinion around their conquest plan. Many have speculated that 911 was that incident and created in the manner of Machiavelli. (A False Flag Event for psyops purposes)

Here is General Wesley Clark expressing his amazement having stumbled upon the plan post 911.



I take exception to the idea that this perpetual war in the Middle East is about Oil, or even economics. Didn't he name in this list of seven countries Libya (minimal oil producer) and Somalia? Is Somalia an oil producer?  (I could be wrong here - but I think that ideology and not economic is the driver here.)

Here is the article by Philip Gilraldi re-tweeted by Valerie Plame, causing the dogs of hell to attack.
Linked here and mirrored below:
Scroll down past this article for a definitive Video on the Subject:
Mirror Transcript in case the original is ever scrubbed from the media:

America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars

Philip Giraldi • September 19, 2017 • 1,600 Words • 1,271 Comments • Reply

UPDATE: On the morning of September 21st Phil Giraldi was fired over the phone by The American Conservative, where he had been a regular contributor for fourteen years. He was told that “America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars” was unacceptable. The TAC management and board appear to have forgotten that the magazine was launched with an article by founder Pat Buchanan entitled “Whose War?” which largely made the same claims that Giraldi made about the Jewish push for another war, in that case with Iraq. Buchanan was vilified and denounced as an anti-Semite by many of the same people who are now similarly attacking Giraldi.
I spoke recently at a conference on America’s war party where afterwards an elderly gentleman came up to me and asked, “Why doesn’t anyone ever speak honestly about the six-hundred-pound gorilla in the room? Nobody has mentioned Israel in this conference and we all know it’s American Jews with all their money and power who are supporting every war in the Middle East for Netanyahu? Shouldn’t we start calling them out and not letting them get away with it?”
It was a question combined with a comment that I have heard many times before and my answer is always the same: any organization that aspires to be heard on foreign policy knows that to touch the live wire of Israel and American Jews guarantees a quick trip to obscurity. Jewish groups and deep pocket individual donors not only control the politicians, they own and run the media and entertainment industries, meaning that no one will hear about or from the offending party ever again. They are particularly sensitive on the issue of so-called “dual loyalty,” particularly as the expression itself is a bit of a sham since it is pretty clear that some of them only have real loyalty to Israel.
Most recently, some pundits, including myself, have been warning of an impending war with Iran. To be sure, the urging to strike Iran comes from many quarters, to include generals in the Administration who always think first in terms of settling problems through force, from a Saudi government obsessed with fear over Iranian hegemony, and, of course, from Israel itself. But what makes the war engine run is provided by American Jews who have taken upon themselves the onerous task of starting a war with a country that does not conceivably threaten the United States. They have been very successful at faking the Iranian threat, so much so that nearly all Republican and most Democratic congressmen as well as much of the media seem to be convinced that Iran needs to be dealt with firmly, most definitely by using the U.S. military, and the sooner the better.
And while they are doing it, the issue that nearly all the Iran haters are Jewish has somehow fallen out of sight, as if it does not matter. But it should matter. A recent article in the New Yorker on stopping the impending war with Iran strangely suggests that the current generation “Iran hawks” might be a force of moderation regarding policy options given the lessons learned from Iraq. The article cites as hardliners on Iran David Frum, Max Boot, Bill Kristol and Bret Stephens.
Daniel Larison over at The American Conservative has a good review of the New Yorker piece entitled “Yes, Iran Hawks Want Conflict with Iran,” which identifies the four above cited hawks by name before describing them as “…a Who’s Who of consistently lousy foreign policy thinking. If they have been right about any major foreign policy issue in the last twenty years, it would be news to the entire world. Every single one of them hates the nuclear deal with Iran with a passion, and they have argued in favor of military action against Iran at one point or another. There is zero evidence that any of them would oppose attacking Iran.”
And I would add a few more names, Mark Dubowitz, Michael Ledeen and Reuel Marc Gerecht of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum; John Podhoretz of Commentary magazine; Elliot Abrams of the Council on Foreign Relations; Meyrav Wurmser of the Middle East Media Research Institute; Kimberly Kagan of the Institute for the Study of War; and Frederick Kagan, Danielle Pletka and David Wurmser of the American Enterprise Institute. And you can also throw into the hopper entire organizations like The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) and the Hudson Institute. And yep, they’re all Jewish, plus most of them would self-describe as neo-conservatives. And I might add that only one of the named individuals has ever served in any branch of the American military – David Wurmser was once in the Navy reserve. These individuals largely constitute a cabal of sanctimonious chairborne warriors who prefer to do the heavy thinking while they let others do the fighting and dying.
So it is safe to say that much of the agitation to do something about Iran comes from Israel and from American Jews. Indeed, I would opine that most of the fury from Congress re Iran comes from the same source, with AIPAC showering our Solons on the Potomac with “fact sheets” explaining how Iran is worthy of annihilation because it has pledged to “destroy Israel,” which is both a lie and an impossibility as Tehran does not have the resources to carry out such a task. The AIPAC lies are then picked up and replayed by an obliging media, where nearly every “expert” who speaks about the Middle East on television and radio or who is interviewed for newspaper stories is Jewish.
One might also add that neocons as a group were founded by Jews and are largely Jewish, hence their universal attachment to the state of Israel. They first rose into prominence when they obtained a number of national security positions during the Reagan Administration and their ascendancy was completed when they staffed senior positions in the Pentagon and White House under George W. Bush. Recall for a moment Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and Scooter Libby. Yes, all Jewish and all conduits for the false information that led to a war that has spread and effectively destroyed much of the Middle East. Except for Israel, of course. Philip Zelikow, also Jewish, in a moment of candor, admitted that the Iraq War, in his opinion, was fought for Israel.
Add to the folly a Jewish U.S. Ambassador to Israel who identifies with the most right-wing Israeli settler elements, a White House appointed chief negotiator who is Jewish and a Jewish son-in-law who is also involved in formulating Middle East policy. Is anyone providing an alternative viewpoint to eternal and uncritical support for Benjamin Netanyahu and his kleptocratic regime of racist thugs? I think not.
There are a couple of simple fixes for the dominant involvement of American Jews in foreign policy issues where they have a personal interest due to their ethnicity or family ties. First of all, don’t put them into national security positions involving the Middle East, where they will potentially be conflicted. Let them worry instead about North Korea, which does not have a Jewish minority and which was not involved in the holocaust. This type of solution was, in fact, somewhat of a policy regarding the U.S. Ambassador position in Israel. No Jew was appointed to avoid any conflict of interest prior to 1995, an understanding that was violated by Bill Clinton (wouldn’t you know it!) who named Martin Indyk to the post. Indyk was not even an American citizen at the time and had to be naturalized quickly prior to being approved by congress.
Those American Jews who are strongly attached to Israel and somehow find themselves in senior policy making positions involving the Middle East and who actually possess any integrity on the issue should recuse themselves, just as any judge would do if he were presiding over a case in which he had a personal interest. Any American should be free to exercise first amendment rights to debate possible options regarding policy, up to and including embracing positions that damage the United States and benefit a foreign nation. But if he or she is in a position to actually create those policies, he or she should butt out and leave the policy generation to those who have no personal baggage.
For those American Jews who lack any shred of integrity, the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.” That would be kind-of-like a warning label on a bottle of rat poison – translating roughly as “ingest even the tiniest little dosage of the nonsense spewed by Bill Kristol at your own peril.”
As none of the above is likely to happen, the only alternative is for American citizens who are tired of having their country’s national security interests hijacked by a group that is in thrall to a foreign government to become more assertive about what is happening. Shine a little light into the darkness and recognize who is being diddled and by whom. Call it like it is. And if someone’s feelings are hurt, too bad. We don’t need a war with Iran because Israel wants one and some rich and powerful American Jews are happy to deliver. Seriously, we don’t need it.

I DO NOT endorse "End Times News Report"  (I don't know them and do not have the knowledge to endorse) but I know from YEARS of study, experience in real life and thousands of books read, and hundreds of thousands of "articles" there is not a single lie in this presentation.

Below is the article just referenced:

IRAQ: War Launched to Protect Israel – Bush Adviser

Reprint |   | Print |
Emad Mekay
WASHINGTON, Mar 29 2004 (IPS) - Iraq under Saddam Hussein did not pose a threat to the United States but it did to Israel, which is one reason why Washington invaded the Arab country, according to a speech made by a member of a top-level White House intelligence group.

IPS uncovered the remarks by Philip Zelikow, who is now the executive director of the body set up to investigate the terrorist attacks on the United States in September 2001 – the 9/11 commission – in which he suggests a prime motive for the invasion just over one year ago was to eliminate a threat to Israel, a staunch U.S. ally in the Middle East.
Zelikow’s casting of the attack on Iraq as one launched to protect Israel appears at odds with the public position of President George W. Bush and his administration, which has never overtly drawn the link between its war on the regime of former president Hussein and its concern for Israel’s security.
The administration has instead insisted it launched the war to liberate the Iraqi people, destroy Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and to protect the United States.
Zelikow made his statements about "the unstated threat" during his tenure on a highly knowledgeable and well-connected body known as the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB), which reports directly to the president.
He served on the board between 2001 and 2003.

"Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I’ll tell you what I think the real threat (is) and actually has been since 1990 – it’s the threat against Israel," Zelikow told a crowd at the University of Virginia on Sep. 10, 2002, speaking on a panel of foreign policy experts assessing the impact of 9/11 and the future of the war on the al-Qaeda terrorist organisation.
"And this is the threat that dare not speak its name, because the Europeans don’t care deeply about that threat, I will tell you frankly. And the American government doesn’t want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell," said Zelikow.
The statements are the first to surface from a source closely linked to the Bush administration acknowledging that the war, which has so far cost the lives of nearly 600 U.S. troops and thousands of Iraqis, was motivated by Washington’s desire to defend the Jewish state.
The administration, which is surrounded by staunch pro-Israel, neo-conservative hawks, is currently fighting an extensive campaign to ward off accusations that it derailed the "war on terrorism" it launched after 9/11 by taking a detour to Iraq, which appears to have posed no direct threat to the United States.
Israel is Washington’s biggest ally in the Middle East, receiving annual direct aid of three to four billion dollars.
Even though members of the 16-person PFIAB come from outside government, they enjoy the confidence of the president and have access to all information related to foreign intelligence that they need to play their vital advisory role.
Known in intelligence circles as "Piffy-ab", the board is supposed to evaluate the nation’s intelligence agencies and probe any mistakes they make.
The unpaid appointees on the board require a security clearance known as "code word" that is higher than top secret.
The national security adviser to former President George H.W. Bush (1989-93) Brent Scowcroft, currently chairs the board in its work overseeing a number of intelligence bodies, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the various military intelligence groups and the Pentagon’s National Reconnaissance Office.
Neither Scowcroft nor Zelikow returned numerous phone calls and email messages from IPS for this story.
Zelikow has long-established ties to the Bush administration.
Before his appointment to PFIAB in October 2001, he was part of the current president’s transition team in January 2001.
In that capacity, Zelikow drafted a memo for National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice on reorganising and restructuring the National Security Council (NSC) and prioritising its work.
Richard A. Clarke, who was counter-terrorism coordinator for Bush’s predecessor President Bill Clinton (1993-2001) also worked for Bush senior, and has recently accused the current administration of not heeding his terrorism warnings, said Zelikow was among those he briefed about the urgent threat from al-Qaeda in December 2000.
Rice herself had served in the NSC during the first Bush administration, and subsequently teamed up with Zelikow on a 1995 book about the unification of Germany.
Zelikow had ties with another senior Bush administration official – Robert Zoellick, the current trade representative. The two wrote three books together, including one in 1998 on the United States and the "Muslim Middle East".
Aside from his position at the 9/11 commission, Zelikow is now also director of the Miller Centre of Public Affairs and White Burkett Miller Professor of History at the University of Virginia.
His close ties to the administration prompted accusations of a conflict of interest in 2002 from families of victims of the 9/11 attacks, who protested his appointment to the investigative body.
In his university speech, Zelikow, who strongly backed attacking the Iraqi dictator, also explained the threat to Israel by arguing that Baghdad was preparing in 1990-91 to spend huge amounts of "scarce hard currency" to harness "communications against electromagnetic pulse", a side-effect of a nuclear explosion that could sever radio, electronic and electrical communications.
That was "a perfectly absurd expenditure unless you were going to ride out a nuclear exchange – they (Iraqi officials) were not preparing to ride out a nuclear exchange with us. Those were preparations to ride out a nuclear exchange with the Israelis", according to Zelikow.
He also suggested that the danger of biological weapons falling into the hands of the anti-Israeli Islamic Resistance Movement, known by its Arabic acronym Hamas, would threaten Israel rather than the United States, and that those weapons could have been developed to the point where they could deter Washington from attacking Hamas.
"Play out those scenarios," he told his audience, "and I will tell you, people have thought about that, but they are just not talking very much about it".
"Don’t look at the links between Iraq and al-Qaeda, but then ask yourself the question, ‘gee, is Iraq tied to Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the people who are carrying out suicide bombings in Israel’? Easy question to answer; the evidence is abundant."
To date, the possibility of the United States attacking Iraq to protect Israel has been only timidly raised by some intellectuals and writers, with few public acknowledgements from sources close to the administration.
Analysts who reviewed Zelikow’s statements said they are concrete evidence of one factor in the rationale for going to war, which has been hushed up.
"Those of us speaking about it sort of routinely referred to the protection of Israel as a component," said Phyllis Bennis of the Washington-based Institute of Policy Studies. "But this is a very good piece of evidence of that."
Others say the administration should be blamed for not making known to the public its true intentions and real motives for invading Iraq.
"They (the administration) made a decision to invade Iraq, and then started to search for a policy to justify it. It was a decision in search of a policy and because of the odd way they went about it, people are trying to read something into it," said Nathan Brown, professor of political science at George Washington University and an expert on the Middle East.
But he downplayed the Israel link. "In terms of securing Israel, it doesn’t make sense to me because the Israelis are probably more concerned about Iran than they were about Iraq in terms of the long-term strategic threat," he said.
Still, Brown says Zelikow’s words carried weight.
"Certainly his position would allow him to speak with a little bit more expertise about the thinking of the Bush administration, but it doesn’t strike me that he is any more authoritative than Wolfowitz, or Rice or Powell or anybody else. All of them were sort of fishing about for justification for a decision that has already been made," Brown said. (END/2004)
Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

NOTE: I have been in sincere prayer for nearly three decades that the "conspirators" no matter who they are, would be exposed by their own hubris.  This is the case with  Valerie Plame Wilson who has capitulated and sacrificed her intellect, thrown it completely on the altar of Tribal Loyalty.  Who knows why she dared to publish TRUTH?

Now in context, since we understand that the "Globalist controlled MEDIA, will do anything, ANYTHING, to control the narrative, to be the thought manufacturers (all other thoughts VERBOTEN) what is the date of the Plame revelation and the Las Vegas Massacre.  I'll be honest I don't know. I was otherwise occupied with my daughter's life and death struggle with cancer.  But my GUT tells me that there is a correlation here.


Written and compiled by-
ARCHPRIEST SYMEON ELIAS - The Orthodox Christian Philosopher.

Sunday, October 8, 2017

Awake and Live, Sleep and Die: The choice has to be made

I've never even once listened to a Michael Savage show, but I have always been in agreement with what he claims as his core philosophy "God, Faith and Reason" and vis a vis our Nation, Borders, Language and Culture. I am presently being berated on the comment section of one of my videos by a Solipsist who claims to be a Pagan, but he is not a Pagan really, rather he is a Solipsist, since even a Pagan, has some belief system greater than himself, something extending from the outside world. He doesn't, the depth of his belief system is first path spirituality "because the way that I have imagined is the way that it is supposed to be." He holds his belief so fanatically that he is willing to beat me up and call me a hatemonger and bigot, call me "fanatical" even state that I should be put in prison for my WORDS, because I believe in God, hold The Faith once and for all delivered, and use reason, and understand that Borders, Language and Culture create a Nation, government cannot. All a government can create is a sphere of authority, however, if that authority does not elevate the culture that Nation is doomed. Sadly this little Solipsist, who believes his thoughts are all his own has been "Marxized" and unless I am willing to bow to the constraints of the Marxist Material Dialectic, I need to be imprisoned.

This same mindset is rampant in a huge portion of the American Population, but it does not reflect the majority by any stretch of the imagination. Though we are all tainted by the Marxist Material Dialectic, frightened to express the spiritual knowledge that is inherent in our faith, the Wisdom of the Holy Spirit, the WORD cutting past the facades and into the structure and core of things; Even though a great many are still embarrassed to speak from the GUT, to exercise and express the base of Godly wisdom they hold, (that still small voice guiding them, guarding them, informing them) more and more are willing to stand and simply say, "NO" when the lies arrive. The CIAmerican Psyops Apparatus, all evil tentacles of it will never make the American Population believe the Las Vegas Lone Gunman psyop, or that Sandy Hook was real, or that 911 was not an inside job. The awakening faith in God, ( imperfect, even broken as it is) I have witnessed in Americans, accompanies a sudden gut-level awareness that real the Culture (that exists in their hearts) and the artificial reality created by the CIA Mind WAR, are at odds and represent a true battle between Good and Evil, Knowledge and Ignorance, Life and Death. Keep awakening my friends, many slumber and perish.